The maximum penalty is the role of the deprivation of criminals, deterrence and reform, Li Qing Department of a farmer, a fine before the Court as to price, and perhaps did not fully investigate the suspect's property status, based only on "price tag" for decision. This humorous verdict, it is difficult to play the true role of fines.
Chen pointed out that the ordinary law, the Public Security Bureau of Economic Investigation Detachment of Inner Mongolia Erdos arrest such action so quickly, the court with very understanding, easy for the public interest, driven by the existence of doubt. By law, a fine should be turned over to the treasury, if the "price penalty" not implemented, not only cause some loss to the country, more difficult to maintain the authority of the law.Cheap Air Jordan 4.5 Outlet Online Store
Cheap Air Jordan 5 (V) Outlet Online Store
RRP: $145.00 $73.89Save: 49% off
Cheap Air Jordan 6 (VI) Outlet Online StoreSound
"Costly penalty"
Is the "selective enforcement" to blame
In fact, with the Henan peasants "astronomical tolls case" is similar to Li Qing, but the encounter is a selective enforcement is not perfect and precise legal situation, the court too much discretion the problem. And it is this monopoly, powerful groups, such as power and for the people to take common law of the main deliberately discriminate against law enforcement and fair law enforcement, so we sad and abnormal tangle: to protect the bottom line of social equity and justice law, Ho time to "equal justice"? ■ According to the legal weekly
0 comments:
Post a Comment